No two soils are alike either in respect of their nature or in respect of quantities of plant nutrients they contain. Under a given situation, the system of farming, soil management and manuring practices, etc., influence the productiovity of soils and crop yields obtained from them. The quantities of the three primary nutrients- N, P2O5 and K2O removed from a hectare of land by some of the important crop are shown in table 1.
It is estimated that the different agricultural crops in India remove about 4.27 million tonnes of nitrogen, 2.13 million tonnes of phosphoric acid, 7.42 million tonnes of potash and 4.88 million tonnes of lime per year. The production of larger yields through improved varities of crops and intensive cultivation will increase the depletion of nutrients still further. But erosion and leaching cause additional losses. The present production of synthetic nitrogenous fertilizers in the country reached 1.5 million tonnes of nitrogen in 1975-76, and the bulky organic manures might supply another 1.5 million tonnes of total nitrogen. The amounts of phosphorous, potash, etc., added to the soil are very small. It is thus obvious that the current huge drain on nutrient supplies will continue to impoverish the soils unless these supplies are replenished by natural or by artificial means, the principal methods of supplementing natural recuperation and for improving the productive capacity of the soils are :(i) to add organic matter to the soil, so that through decay, it may furnish a more or less continuous supply of nuttrients for crops, and (ii) to restore or increase the amount of defficient nutrients by the application of fertilizers. The urgent need of the constantly expanding agriculture production to meet the requirements of the continually increasing human and cattle populations in India makes the supply of additional plant nutrients through fertilizers and organic manures, a problem of supreme importance.
Table 1. The quantities of plant nutrients removed from soil by different crops (Kg/ha)
| Crop |
Yield (grain)kg/ha |
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
| Rice |
2,240 |
34 |
22 |
67 |
| Wheat |
1,568 |
56 |
24 |
67 |
| Jawar |
1,792 |
56 |
15 |
146 |
| Bajra |
1,120 |
36 |
22 |
66 |
| Maize |
2,016 |
36 |
20 |
39 |
| Barley |
1,120 |
41 |
20 |
35 |
| Sugarcane |
67,200 |
90 |
17 |
202 |
| Groundnut |
1,904 |
78 |
22 |
45 |
| Mustard |
672 |
22 |
11 |
28 |
| Linseed |
1,008 |
19 |
12 |
33 |
| Cotton |
448 |
30 |
17 |
45 |
| Jute |
1,568 |
67 |
34 |
67 |
| Tea |
896 |
45 |
13 |
28 |
| Coffee |
896 |
34 |
11 |
34 |
| Tobacco |
1,456 |
94 |
57 |
91 |
TYPES OF MANURES AND FERTILIZERS
Indian soils are usually very poor in organin matter as well as in nitrogen. Pohsphate deficiency is less wide-spread and potash deficiency generally occurs in com-pact areas. In acid soils the addition of lome steps up production.
Table 2. The average nutrients contents of manures
| Manure | Percentage content |
| Nitrogen(N) |
Phodphoric acid(P2O5) |
Potash (K2O) |
Animal refuse |
| | |
| Cattle dung, fresh |
0.3 - 0.4 |
0.1 - 0.2 |
0.1 - 0.3 |
| Horse dung, fresh |
0.4 - 0.7 |
0.3 - 0.4 |
0.3 - 0.4 |
| Sheep dung, fresh |
0.5 - 0.7 |
0.4 - 0.6 |
0.3 - 1.0 |
| Nightsoil, fresh |
1.0 - 1.6 |
0.8 - 1.2 |
0.2 - 0.6 |
| Poultry manure, fresh |
1.0 - 1.8 |
1.4 - 1.8 |
0.8 - 0.9 |
| Raw sewage,fresh |
2.0 - 3.0 |
|
|
| Sewage sludge, dry |
2.0 - 3.5 |
1.0 - 5.0 |
0.2 - 0.5 |
| Sewage sludge, activated dry |
4.0 - 7.0 |
2.1 - 4.2 |
0.5 - 0.7 |
| Cattle urine |
0.9 - 1.2 | tr. |
0.5 - 1.0 |
| Horse urine |
1.2 - 1.5 |
tr. |
1.3 - 1.5 |
| Human urine |
0.6 - 1.0 |
0.1 - 0.2 |
0.2 - 0.3 |
| Sheep urine |
1.5 - 1.7 |
tr. |
1.8 - 2.0 |
Wood ashes |
|
|
|
| Ash coal |
0.73 |
0.45 |
0.53 |
| Ash, household |
0.5 - 1.9 |
1.6 - 4.2 |
2.3 - 12.0 |
| Ash,gurhal |
0.1 - 0.2 |
0.8 - 1.3 |
1.5 - 3.1 |
| Ash, babul wood |
0.1 - 0.2 |
2.5 - 3.0 |
3.5 - 4.5 |
| Ash, casuarina wood |
tr. |
1.4 |
14.0 |
| sh, eucalyptus wood |
tr. |
5.9 |
23.8 |
| Ash, tobacco, stem |
tr. |
2.6 |
36.0 |
Farm, factory and habitation wastes |
|
|
|
| Rural compost, dry |
0.5 - 1.0 |
0.4 - 0.8 |
0.8 - 1.2 |
| Urban compost, dry |
0.7 - 2.0 |
0.9 - 3.0 |
1.0 - 2.0 |
| Farmyard manure, dry |
0.4 - 1.5 |
0.3 - 0.9 |
0.3 - 1.9 |
| Filter-press cake |
1.0 - 1.5 |
4.0 - 5.0 |
2.0 - 7.0 |
|
|
|
|
| Rice hulls |
0.3 - 0.5 |
0.2 - 0.5 |
0.3 - 0.5 |
| Groundnut husks |
1.6 - 1.8 |
0.3 - 0.5 |
1.1 - 1.7 |
Straw and stalks |
|
|
|
| Bajra |
0.65 |
0.75 |
| Banana, dry |
0.61 |
0.12 |
1.00 |
| Cotton |
0.44 |
0.10 |
0.66 |
| Jowar |
0.40 |
0.23 |
2.17 |
| Maize |
0.42 |
1.57 |
1.65 |
| Paddy |
0.36 |
0.08 |
0.71 |
| Tobacco |
1.12 |
0.84 |
0.80 |
| Tur, arhar |
1.10 |
0.58 |
1.28 |
| Wheat |
0.53 |
0.10 |
1.10 |
| Sugarcane trash |
0.35 |
0.10 |
0.60 |
| Tobacco dust |
1.10 |
0.31 |
0.93 |
Tree leaves, dry |
|
|
|
| Calotropis gigantea |
0.35 |
0.12 |
0.36 |
| Careya arborea |
1.67 |
0.40 |
2.20 |
| cassia auriculata |
0.98 |
0.12 |
0.67 |
| Dellinia pentagyana |
1.34 |
0.50 |
3.20 |
| Madhuca indica |
1.66 |
0.50 |
2.00 |
| Pongamia pinnata, karanj, honge |
3.69 |
2.41 |
2.42 |
| Pterocarpus marsupium |
1.97 |
0.40 |
2.90 |
| Terminalia chebula |
1.46 |
0.35 |
1.35 |
| Terminalia paniculata |
1.70 |
0.40 |
1.60 |
| Terminalia tomentosa |
1.39 |
0.40 |
1.80 |
| Xylia dolabriformis |
1.37 |
0.30 |
1.61 |
Green manures, fresh |
|
|
|
| Chavli, lobia, cowpea (Vigna catjang) |
0.71 |
0.15 |
0.58 |
| Dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) |
0.62 |
.. |
.. |
| Guar; Cluster-bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) |
0.34 |
.. |
.. |
| Kulthi ; horse-gram (Dolochos biflorus) |
0.33 |
.. |
.. |
| Mathi, moth; moth-bean (Phaseolus aconitifolius |
0.80 |
.. |
.. |
| Mug, mung; green-gram (Phaseolus aureus) |
0.72 |
0.18 |
0.53 |
| Sann, sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea) |
0.75 |
0.12 |
0.51 |
| Urd, Urid; black-gram (Phaseolus mungo) |
0.85 |
0.18 |
0.53 |
Materials which are commonly used to maintain and improve soil fertility may be classified as follows:
(1) MANURES. These are relatively bulky materials, such as animal or green manures, which are added mainly to improve the physical condition of the soil, to replenish and keep up its humus status, to maintain the optimum conditions for the activities of soil micro-organisms and make good a small part of the plant nutrients removed by crops or otherwise lost through leaching and soil erosion. They, thus, supply practically all the elements of fertility which crops require, though not in adequate proportions. The plant-food elements contained in a manure are released in an available form after it is applied to the soil and is decomposed by soil micro-organisms. Similarly, the green manures add not only substantial amounts of organic matter but also nitrogen.
(2) FERTILIZERS. Fertilizers are inorganic materials of a concentrated nature; they are applied mainly to increase the supply of one or more of the essential nutrients, e.g. nitrogen, phosphorous and potash. Fertilizers contain these elements in the form of soluble of readily available chemical compounds. This distinction is, however, not very rigid. In common parlance the fertilizers are sometimes called 'chemical','artificial' or 'inorganic' manures.
(3) CONCENTRATED ORGANIC MANURES. Some of the concentrated materials, such as oil-cakes, bone-meal, urine and blood are of organic origin. The use of manures and fertilizers is complementary and not as a substitute for each other.
(4) BULKY ORGANIC MANURES. the properties and role of organic matter and humus in the soil have been explained already. Table2 gives the average nutrient contents of manures and other organic raw materials which may be used to maintain the humus content of the soil.
(1) Farmyard manure. Good-quality farmyard manure is perhaps the most valuable organic matter applied to a soil. It is the most commonly used organic manure in India. It consists of a mixture of cattle dung, the bedding, used in the stable and of any ramnants of straw and plant stalks fed to cattle. Though its crop-increasing value has been recognised from time immemorial, more than 50 per cent of the cattle dung produced in the country today is burnt as fuel and is thus lost to agriculture. Not only this tremendous waste, but also the tradition method of preparing and storing the farmyard manure is generally faulty. The cattle-dung, together with stable-waste and house sweeping, is first collected in the open backyard, and when a cartload has been collected, it is removed to another heap or to an uncovered pit in a common plot outside the village. The loose heaps lie exposed to the sun, with the result that the raw organic matter dries up quickly and does not rot properly. Very often, a part of the dry dung is blown off by wind or washed away by rain. Cattle urine is either not conserved or is stored in a defective manner. American studies on the distribution of soil derived elements between urine and faeces of dry cows have shown that 95 per cent pf Potassium, 63 per cent of nitrogen and 50 per cent of sulphur are contained in the urine. The wastage of nitrogen-rich urine, the loss of nitrogen(in the form of ammonia) due to the fermentation of exposed cattle dung, and the washing away of soluble mineral elements be leaching reduce its manurial value in India to a great extent. Its average content of plant nutrients under Indian and European conditions is shown below for comparison:
Percentage content
| N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
| India |
0.3 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
| European countries |
1.0 |
0.30 |
1.0 |
About half of this nitrogen, one-sixth of phosphorous and more than half of potash are readily soluble and subject to dissipation. However, the loss of nitrogen and minerals elements caused by careless handeling can be reduced greatly by using absorbent bedding for cattle, storing dung in stone or brick-line pits, mixing large quantioties of straw and other vegitable matter with cattle dung, and keeping the heap compact and moist. Thus, if urine is properly conserved, the loss of soluble mineral elements through seepage is prevented, bacterial decomposition of raw organic matter is encouraged, plant nutrients are made soluble, and nitrogen losses are minimised. The relative absorbent capacity of different materials that may be used as bedding for cattle may be judged from the following figures given in table 3.
Table 3. The relative absorbent capacity of different materials used as bedding for cattle
| Material |
Quantity of water (in kg) retained by one kg of the following materials after 24 hours of soaking |
| Wheat straw |
2.20 |
| Peat straw | 2.80 |
| Dry leaves |
2.00 |
| Peat |
6.00 |
| Sawdust |
4.35 |
| Soil |
0.50 |
| Sand |
0.25 |
If urine is not conserved in the bedding used for cattle it must be collected in covered pucca cistern and then, added to the dung in the manure pit. Nitrogen in the urine is mainly in the form of urea, which readily changes into the highly volatile ammonium carbonate through bacterial action, and quickly loses ammonia thereafter by evaporation. This loss can be reduced to a great deal if the manure and the urine-soaked absorptive itter for bedding are kept compacted in a pit. The pit may be 1 m in depth, 1.3 to 1.5 m in width and 4.5 to 6 m in length, depending upon the no. of cattle on a farm. The filling of the pit should be 'sectional' and when each section of three or 1.3 m in length is filled to about 45 cm above the ground level, it should be clustered with 2.5 cm layer of a mixture of mud and dung in equal proportions. Before plastering, 4 to 5 buckets of water should be added to the manure in the pit. Plastering conserves moisture and nitrogen and also prevents housefly nuisance. The manure becomes ready for use in about 4 to 5 months after plastering.
The quality of manure is also improved by the concentrated feeds given to cattle. Cotton-seed, cotton-seed cake, linseed-meal, wheat bran, grain husk, groundnut cake, gram, horse-gram, etc. are rich in nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, magnesium and sulphur. It has been found that in the case of adult working-cattle about 80 per cent of nitrogen and the other mineral elements contained in the feed is recovered in urine, faeces and other animal by-products. Accordingly, manure from cattle fed on cereal straws and grass hay is much less valuable than that from animals fed on legume hays, grains and concentrates.
In foreign countries, considerable attention has been given to the use of preservatives on manure. Calcium sulphate or gypsum and superphosphate have proved most promising in preventing the escape of ammomnia. Gypsum has been found specially effective as an ammonia-absorbing agent. Superphosphate, besides absorbing ammonia, supplies additional phosphorous and, thus, improves the crop producing capacity of the manure.